We collect cookies to analyze our website traffic and performance; we never collect any personal data. Cookie Policy
Accept
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Exploring the steadiness of danger desire: Meta-analysis reveals discrepancies in the way it’s measured
Share
Font ResizerAa
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Follow US
NEW YORK DAWN™ > Blog > Health > Exploring the steadiness of danger desire: Meta-analysis reveals discrepancies in the way it’s measured
Exploring the steadiness of danger desire: Meta-analysis reveals discrepancies in the way it’s measured
Health

Exploring the steadiness of danger desire: Meta-analysis reveals discrepancies in the way it’s measured

Last updated: February 9, 2025 4:10 pm
Editorial Board Published February 9, 2025
Share
SHARE

Movement chart of the crew’s systematic seek for longitudinal samples. Credit score: Bagaïnii et al. (Nature Human Behaviour, 2025).

Previous psychology analysis means that some persons are extra inclined than others to take dangers in unsure conditions, reminiscent of investing cash in dangerous enterprise ventures, consuming addictive substances or leaving a safe job with none positive various prospects. Over the previous many years, psychologists and behavioral scientists have been attempting to grasp the extent to which individuals’s willingness to take dangers (i.e., danger desire) is secure and coherent, which implies that it tends to stay constant over time and throughout totally different contexts.

Many current research have got down to examine the steadiness of danger desire and the extent to which it may be thought-about a coherent character trait. But, the findings collected up to now have been combined, which has made it tough to succeed in definitive conclusions.

Researchers on the College of Basel in Switzerland not too long ago reviewed a number of previous research exploring the steadiness of danger desire within the hope of higher understanding the character of this extensively investigated trait. Their analyses, revealed in Nature Human Behaviour, confirmed that there’s vital variability throughout present literature, each when it comes to the measures of danger desire used, the pattern of members recruited and the kinds of dangers that have been assessed.

“Understanding whether risk preference represents a stable, coherent trait is central to efforts aimed at explaining, predicting and preventing risk-related behaviors,” wrote Alexandra Bagaïnii, Yunrui Liu and their colleagues of their paper. “We help characterize the nature of the construct by adopting a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analytic approach to summarize the temporal stability of 358 risk preference measures.”

As a part of their meta-analysis, the researchers reviewed 33 previous longitudinal research, which concerned 57 samples, for a complete of 579,114 members. To match these research, they divided the danger desire measures utilized by the groups concerned into three broad classes, in addition to the demographic traits of members.

“Our findings reveal noteworthy heterogeneity across and within measure categories (propensity, frequency and behavior), domains (for example, investment, occupational and alcohol consumption) and sample characteristics (for example, age),” wrote Bagaïnii, Liu and their colleagues.

“Specifically, while self-reported propensity and frequency measures of risk preference show a higher degree of stability than behavioral measures, these patterns are moderated by domain and age.”

Bagaïnii, Liu and their colleagues additionally performed an evaluation assessing the diploma to which totally different measures of danger preferences utilized in previous research aligned (i.e., their convergent validity). Their findings confirmed that their convergent validity was low, that means that the measures employed in previous literature didn’t essentially seize a single trait however as an alternative various kinds of tendencies to take dangers.

“Our results raise concerns about the coherence and measurement of the risk preference construct,” wrote Bagaïnii, Liu and their colleagues.

Total, this current meta-analysis highlights the inconsistencies in how danger desire was measured and conceptualized in earlier analysis. The findings of the crew’s analyses might information future research specializing in folks’s danger preferences, probably prompting the event of extra exact definitions of danger desire and extra dependable measures that may very well be utilized throughout a variety of contexts.

Extra data:
Alexandra Bagaïni et al, A scientific assessment and meta-analyses of the temporal stability and convergent validity of danger desire measures, Nature Human Behaviour (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02085-2.

© 2025 Science X Community

Quotation:
Exploring the steadiness of danger desire: Meta-analysis reveals discrepancies in the way it’s measured (2025, February 9)
retrieved 9 February 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/information/2025-02-exploring-stability-meta-analysis-reveals.html

This doc is topic to copyright. Aside from any truthful dealing for the aim of personal research or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is offered for data functions solely.

You Might Also Like

Ladies with painful intervals are twice as possible as their friends to have signs of tension or melancholy

Cardiorespiratory results of wildfire smoke particles can persist for months, even after a fireplace has ended

Trump will not pressure Medicaid to cowl GLP-1s for weight problems: A couple of states are doing it anyway

People are seasonal creatures, in accordance with our circadian rhythms

Cambodia experiences fourth chook flu demise this yr

TAGGED:discrepanciesexploringmeasuredMetaanalysispreferencerevealsriskstability
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow
Popular News
Required Studying
Art

Required Studying

Editorial Board February 14, 2025
Ethically skilled AI startup Pleias releases new small reasoning fashions optimized for RAG with built-in citations
Why Does Coffee Make Me Poop?
The Photographs of Bucha Should Change the War in Ukraine
The Violent and Sensual Our bodies of Galli

You Might Also Like

Physique dimension in formative years related to elevated threat of colorectal most cancers
Health

Physique dimension in formative years related to elevated threat of colorectal most cancers

May 28, 2025
Attaching fluorescing dye to oral most cancers proteins may yield highly effective prediction device for various most cancers varieties
Health

Attaching fluorescing dye to oral most cancers proteins may yield highly effective prediction device for various most cancers varieties

May 28, 2025
Unique COVID-19 vaccination didn’t cease immune system from combating variants, finds examine
Health

Unique COVID-19 vaccination didn’t cease immune system from combating variants, finds examine

May 28, 2025
Two genes linked to frequent inflammatory arthritis counsel new remedy choices
Health

Two genes linked to frequent inflammatory arthritis counsel new remedy choices

May 28, 2025

Categories

  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • World
  • Art

About US

New York Dawn is a proud and integral publication of the Enspirers News Group, embodying the values of journalistic integrity and excellence.
Company
  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • Accessibility Statement
Contact Us
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Term of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
© 2024 New York Dawn. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?