In a particular oversight listening to at New York Metropolis Corridor this morning, February 28, Brooklyn Museum employees, union representatives, and Metropolis Council members referred to as on the establishment to “exhaust all options” earlier than implementing its lately introduced mass layoffs affecting 47 full- and part-time workers. Earlier this week, District Council 37 Native 1502 and UAW Native 2110 — the 2 unions representing employees on the museum — rallied exterior the establishment with a whole bunch of supporters to protest the sweeping employees cuts, which management has described as inevitable within the face of a $10 million finances shortfall.
“ Myself and my colleagues were shocked and saddened that the place we love had eschewed its long-time values for a DOGE-esque consolidation of power,” stated June Lei, Native 1502 secretary and full-time producer on the Brooklyn Museum, who testified on the listening to. “Today, it is balancing its budget on the backs of workers who lose their benefits, salaries, pensions, and union membership.”
The Committee on Civil Service and Labor, chaired by Council Member Carmen De La Rosa, referred to as as we speak’s listening to to look at whether or not employees have been pretty handled by the museum and assess the layoffs in mild of the establishment’s monetary circumstances. The committee has additionally inspired people to submit written testimony on-line.
Employees rallied exterior the Brooklyn Museum on Tuesday, February 25. (picture Valentina Di Liscia/Hyperallergic)
In the beginning of the listening to, De La Rosa put inquiries to Laurie Cumbo, commissioner of the New York Metropolis Division of Cultural Affairs (DCLA), which offers about $10.5 million in funds to the Brooklyn Museum. These metropolis subsidies cowl about 20% of the museum’s operational finances together with roughly 50% of DC 37 salaries in roles together with safety, upkeep, and assortment care, with the museum liable for the rest.
De La Rosa requested Cumbo whether or not DCLA requires recipient establishments to offer monetary contingency plans to stop employee reductions.
“DCLA expects all of its constituents to adhere to all applicable laws in this regard,” Cumbo responded. “ The city is proud to support institutions that choose to work with strong, organized unions and to set a minimum base rate of pay through their own negotiations.”
De La Rosa reiterated her query: “ I get that, but do you all require contingency plans when we’re at the point where layoffs are being considered?”
“We do not have a contingency plan requirement,” Cumbo responded.
“What about requiring institutions receiving city funding to follow specific labor standards or engage in good-faith negotiations with unions before implementing layoffs?” De La Rosa requested.
“We require that all groups follow all applicable federal, state, and local law,” Cumbo stated.
Division of Cultural Affairs Commissioner Laurie Cumbo testified at as we speak’s listening to.
Emphasizing a drop in personal and company contributions, Cumbo spoke in protection of Brooklyn Museum management who she stated “prioritized the long-term health of the institution.”
Each unions, nevertheless, have expressed frustration over the museum’s failure to discover options resembling furloughs or buyouts. Hyperallergic reported on the anticipated layoffs on February 6 and the cuts have been confirmed throughout an all-staff assembly on the museum the subsequent day. The unions stated they got just a few days’ discover earlier than the choice was introduced.
In an announcement to Hyperallergic this week, the museum maintained that it’s complying with the 30-day discover interval as a result of the layoffs will likely be efficient March 9. However in a February 28 letter from Museum Director Anne Pasternak to De La Rosa, copies of which have been supplied by a museum consultant at as we speak’s listening to, Pasternak characterised the layoffs as “unavoidable.”
Neither Pasternak nor different members of the Brooklyn Museum’s senior management have been current on the listening to. Hyperallergic has contacted the museum for remark.
Division of Cultural Affairs Commissioner Laurie Cumbo testified on the listening to.
”There is no such thing as a cause why 47 folks needs to be dropping their jobs till we exhaust the whole lot attainable, and we’re committing to our union and our brothers and sisters in different unions to battle, as a result of these employees deserve no much less,” DC 37 Govt Director Henry A. Garrido stated in his testimony.
Garrido recalled that in 2016, the Brooklyn Museum took various measures, like voluntary furloughs, as an alternative of leaving employees within the lurch.
“It seems to me that all options have not been exhausted,” Council Member De La Rosa agreed. ”I reiterate what my colleagues have stated right here: Layoffs are absolutely the, needs to be absolutely the, final resort.”
Garrido additionally questioned the timing of the cuts, provided that the town’s finances course of ends in June. “Why not wait to see what we could have done?” he requested. “If we had a way to reduce that $10 million [deficit] to, say, $6 million, then perhaps you didn’t have to lay off 47 people, perhaps you could have reduced that to 20. And then we could have tried to figure out how to go from 20 to zero.”
The committee mentioned various funding methods to assist alleviate the deficit, resembling charging for programming just like the museum’s fashionable First Saturdays occasion, which was lately scrapped altogether as a part of Pasternak’s cost-saving plan. (Cumbo countered that monetizing the occasion would “change the dynamics” of the museum, which maintains a pay-what-you-wish coverage for all guests.) District 5 Council Member Julie Menin additionally prompt making the most of funds from the New York Metropolis Tourism and Conventions Bureau to amp up advertising and marketing efforts that might herald paying guests earlier than resorting to “draconian measures” like layoffs.
Employees and union representatives gathered at 250 Broadway for a particular oversight listening to on the Brooklyn Museum layoffs.
Each unions argued that the museum ignored contract stipulations resembling seniority, alleging that the establishment strategically selected to chop workers with the intent of weakening union energy.
“It’s not only that they’re laying people off, which is bad enough, but they have used these layoffs in a targeted way, weaponized this in a targeted way,” stated Maida Rosenstein, director of organizing for Native 2110.
“Our union chairperson has been laid off, a curator at the museum who’s been there for years and who is in the midst of a major deaccessioning project,” Rosenstein stated, referring to Liz St. George, an assistant curator within the Ornamental Arts division, who additionally testified as we speak. “This makes no sense except in the context of union-busting.” Native 2110 and Native 1520 have filed Nationwide Labor Relations Board prices in opposition to the museum.
The Committee on Civil Service and Labor holds a particular Metropolis Council oversight listening to.
Throughout the February 7 all-staff assembly, Pasternak knowledgeable employees that the museum would additionally implement a hiring freeze, programming reductions, and wage cuts of 10% to twenty% for senior workers to handle a “significant cash flow problem.” Nonetheless, the layoffs could be needed as a result of salaries make up 70% of the museum’s working finances, she stated. In 2023, Pasternak earned a wage of $1,012,633, based on the newest public filings.
In her letter to De La Rosa, Pasternak attributes the museum’s monetary shortfall partly to the town’s “failure to keep pace with funding DC 37 salaries, requiring the Museum to cover a much larger share.” Baseline funding, Pasternak wrote, stays stagnant at “about the same amount it was in 2015” regardless of rising inflation.
The unions, in the meantime, pressured that whereas metropolis help is important, the present monetary image is essentially a results of “its own fiscal mismanagement.”
“The Museum spent millions of dollars on consultants in ‘rebranding,’ hiring outside consultants, and creating very high-paid management positions,” Rosenstein stated.
In his written testimony, Garrido accused the museum of “placing the burden of this financial deficit on the backs of [workers],” a few of whom earn as little as $30,000 a 12 months.
“Here’s what we know: The annual compensation of the director of the Brooklyn Museum, north of $1 million, exceeds the combined salary of all 19 of our members losing their jobs,” Garrido stated. “If everyone at the museum who made above a quarter of a million dollars a year took one week’s unpaid furlough, we could save jobs.”
