Visiting a disaster middle is a typical expertise amongst reproductive aged-women in these 4 states. Credit score: OPEN, CC-BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Between 12 and 20% of girls with a historical past of being pregnant or testing for being pregnant visited disaster being pregnant facilities throughout 4 U.S. states, in response to a brand new research by Maria Gallo and colleagues from The Ohio State College, U.S., printed in PLOS One.
Disaster being pregnant facilities (CPCs) sometimes present being pregnant and parenting sources and affiliate with organizations which promote missions targeted on stopping abortion, opposing contraception, and advocating for abstinence exterior of marriage.
They’re sometimes not medically licensed clinics, although they are often perceived as medical amenities or abortion clinics, and infrequently present inaccurate or deceptive details about sexual and reproductive well being. There may be restricted proof on what number of ladies use such facilities.
On this research, researchers used knowledge for 2018 to 2020 from Surveys of Girls, a population-representative survey of grownup ladies in 4 U.S. states (Arizona, Wisconsin, Iowa and New Jersey). The info comprised practically 9,000 ladies.
Of the ladies who reported ever being pregnant or ever having examined for being pregnant and thus might need had a motive to attend a CPC, 11.6% to twenty.2% reported visiting a CPC for pregnancy-related care. Attendance was highest in Arizona at 20.2% and lowest in New Jersey at 11.6%. The opposite two states represented, Wisconsin and Iowa, every had attendance charges of roughly 14%. The research discovered no correlation between CPC attendance and age, race/ethnicity, or socioeconomic standing.
The outcomes function an necessary pre-Dobbs measurement of CPC attendance that will probably be key to understanding their position in pregnancy-related well being because the reproductive well being care panorama shifts.
The authors add, “Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are unlicensed facilities that often pose as medical clinics to target pregnant people. The centers are increasingly supported with public funding in the U.S. Because the centers do not have to follow medical and safety standards, people should not turn to them for medical care.”
“We surveyed a representative group of adult, reproductive-age women in four states. We found that attending a CPC in each of the states was not rare. Attendance among all women ranged from one in 11 women in New Jersey to one in six women in Arizona.”
“Previous studies have shown that CPCs spread inaccurate health information. This new work shows that attending these centers is not rare. Given these findings, providers should be aware that their pregnant patients might have previously attended a CPC and might have been exposed to misinformation that needs to be corrected.”
Extra info:
Yang TJ, et al. Prevalence of disaster being pregnant middle attendance amongst ladies in 4 U.S. states, PLOS One (2025). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324228
Offered by
Public Library of Science
Quotation:
Many ladies flip to disaster being pregnant facilities regardless of considerations over misinformation (2025, June 4)
retrieved 4 June 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/information/2025-06-women-crisis-pregnancy-centers-misinformation.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Aside from any truthful dealing for the aim of personal research or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is offered for info functions solely.
