Via October 25, the nonprofit Artwork at a Time Like This, co-founded by curators Barbara Pollack and Anne Verhallen, is exhibiting works by artists who’ve “experienced censorship firsthand,” in accordance with an data sheet. Don’t Look Now: A Protection of Free Expression facilities a rising variety of artists who’ve confronted art work removals, exhibition cancellations, and different types of suppression for causes together with President Trump’s crackdown on DEI and anti-Palestine sentiment. Pollack additionally cautioned that some establishments had been self-censoring, presumably a consequence of ideological funding cuts from entities just like the Nationwide Endowment for the Arts.
Second-floor set up shot that includes Readability Hayne’s “Big Birth” (2022)
Hyperallergic has reported lots of the exhibition’s artists’ tales. One of the crucial identifiable of artworks viewers instantly see upon getting into the gallery is Danielle SeeWalker’s “G is for Genocide” (2024) portray, which the city of Vail, Colorado, cited in its controversial determination to revoke her artist residency final 12 months. The American Civil Liberties Union intervened by launching a free speech lawsuit in opposition to the municipality, which was finally settled on phrases negotiated by the artist.
A stapled paper packet out there within the gallery tells the story of every art work and the artist’s allegations of censorship, starting from claims that social media is taking down photographs to cancellations of residencies and whole artwork exhibitions and applications. All the works are on mortgage and can be returned to the artists on the finish of the present.


Andil Gosine’s “Magna Carta” (2025) (left) and Margarita Cabrera’s “Space in Between – Nopal, in collaboration with A.N. (Mexico/USA)” (2022) (proper)
Don’t Look Now additionally features a copy of Trinidadian artist Andil Gosine’s altered childhood {photograph} “Magna Carta” (2025). The picture was supposed to seem as a large-scale banner in an exhibition curated by Gosine exploring sexuality within the Caribbean that was nixed by the Artwork Museum of the Americas earlier this 12 months with out offering a cause. Paperwork reviewed by Hyperallergic in February prompt that the US authorities had withdrawn funding from one other exhibition on the Caribbean on the museum, whose curator claimed the present had been designated a “DEI program.”
“In Don’t Look Now, the low-quality reproduction of the original banner to a smidgen of its size and force says everything about how this moment feels,” Gosine instructed Hyperallergic. “The art is a footnote, a note in a politically urgent story, but I long for the day when it might be given space to re-emerge as more than a footnote, and returned to its creative intention.”

Yvonne Iten-Scott’s quilt “Origin” (2023)
Yvonne Iten-Scott’s quilt “Origin” (2023) hangs upstairs. The work, resembling feminine anatomy, was excluded from a touring present organized by the American Quilter’s Society over the group’s issues that the work “could be considered controversial,” in accordance with people accustomed to the scenario.
“I am feeling a sense of validation that my art is being shown alongside these other incredible artists who have also had a similar experience,” Iten-Scott mentioned. “I hope that this exhibition sparks more conversations about artistic freedom and expression.”
Different exhibited works included Khánh Nguyên Hoàng Vũ’s “How we live like water” (2024), which pictorially represents the phrase “from the river to the sea.” The work, on show in a Walgreens window in Miami Seaside, was eliminated by the native nonprofit Oolite Arts. Additionally on view are a sculpture by Margarita Cabrera, who withdrew her participation from a Smithsonian symposium, citing censorship issues; a poster by Shepard Fairey interrogating abuses of energy that was the topic of a free speech lawsuit; and a video art work by Evan Apodaca that was faraway from the San Diego airport, allegedly for criticizing the US navy.

The doorway to Don’t Look Now: A Protection of Free Expression
The Nationwide Coalition In opposition to Censorship (NCAC) referred Pollack to a number of the circumstances of alleged censorship that the group was trying into. A panel occasion held together with the present included Elizabeth Larrison, who leads NCAC’s Arts and Tradition Advocacy Program.
“Over the past 25 years, much of NCAC’s work to defend artistic freedom in the US has occurred out of public view,” Larrison instructed Hyperallergic. “Public-facing exhibition and event opportunities like those presented by Art at a Time Like This are valuable in that they bring visibility to this work and to the often insidious ways in which censorship threatens our democracy.”
Pollack likened the state of inventive expression to the proverbial “canary in the coal mine.”
“It is not surprising that [in] authoritarian countries, including the United States … one of the first things they crack down on is free expression,” Pollack mentioned. “That is because often artists get to the heart of the intersection between feelings and facts and make people move to take action or feel like they’re not alone in their feelings.”

Khánh Nguyên Hoàng Vũ’s “How we live like water” (2024)

Evan Apodaca’s “Monumental Interventions” (2023), which was allegedly faraway from the San Diego Airport for its criticism of the navy.

