Credit score: Unsplash/CC0 Public Area
Not all merchandise are equally helpful for everybody. Some are double-edged swords—used appropriately, they are often lifesavers; however used within the mistaken arms or the mistaken manner, there might be important dangers concerned.
This creates a problem for entrepreneurs: speaking dangers and advantages in tandem, with out downplaying both one, or creating paralyzing cognitive dissonance. This pressure is particularly true within the pharmaceutical trade, the place firms spend billions selling prescribed drugs on-line. Large Pharma’s promoting reached an estimated $30 billion in 2024, and pharmaceutical web sites alone account for practically 8% of trade promotional budgets, underscoring the significance of digital codecs in shaping affected person choices.
In a forthcoming paper, Siddharth Bhattacharya and Nirup Menon, school from the knowledge methods and operations administration space on the Costello Faculty of Enterprise at George Mason College, together with Jennifer Ball (Temple College) got down to examine this drawback. Their aim was to grasp how pharmaceutical web sites can higher current each dangers and advantages with out overwhelming or deceptive customers.
On the heart of their work is the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration’s “fair balance” necessities stating that advertisers should showcase dangers and advantages roughly equally. Reaching this “fair balance” is tough as guidelines are obscure, particularly within the digital context. The crew attracts upon insights from cognitive psychology to indicate how the rules of salience and summarization might be blended to advertise simultaneous consciousness of dangers and advantages.
“Simply put, salience refers to qualities that grab attention in the moment, while summarization enables sustained processing of multifaceted information,” says Bhattacharya.
These ideas align with how actual customers allocate their restricted consideration in digital environments—shortly, selectively, and sometimes underneath cognitive load.
The researchers examined these rules in a large-scale randomized experiment involving 452 individuals. Every participant was proven a special model of a mock pharmaceutical web site. Utilizing eye-tracking know-how, the researchers measured what they seen, how lengthy they lingered, what they remembered, and actions they supposed to take. Some designs emphasised dangers upfront (modal dialog pop-ups); others offered info in side-by-side (desk) format or in conventional codecs.
The outcomes have been telling. Designs that maximized each salience and summarization—significantly the desk format—elevated threat recognition by 13%, improved profit recall by 9%, and raised follow-up intention by 23%, in comparison with commonplace codecs. In contrast, the modal dialog design, which prioritized salience alone, raised threat recognition by 12% and follow-up intention by 19%, however diminished profit recall by about 11%, highlighting a tradeoff between engagement and stability.
The researchers emphasize that strict “fair balance” guidelines could not all the time obtain their supposed impact. Generally, designs that technically over-emphasize dangers truly assist sufferers make higher decisions. Different instances, barely skewing the presentation—e.g., emphasizing threat extra closely in early levels—can improve shopper outcomes and belief, even when it seems to violate the FDA’s “fair balance” guidelines.
Bhattacharya and Menon additionally argue that web site design has an impression extending far past pharma.
“Whether you’re a CMO in financial services designing disclosures, a compliance officer in consumer goods, or a product manager trying to responsibly market AI tools, the principle is the same on how you present competing information. Risks versus benefits can dramatically shape consumer trust, comprehension, and action,” they are saying.
For enterprise leaders, the message is sort of clear: “Smart design is not just about aesthetics. It’s a lever for behavioral change, customer trust, and public impact,” the authors say.
Wanting forward, their broader aim is to assist organizations suppose otherwise about compliance. As a substitute of treating laws as a burden, companies can see them as alternatives to raised showcase their info, ones that empower customers to make knowledgeable choices.
Extra info:
Siddharth Bhattacharya et al, Designing for Affect: How Shopper Consideration, Reminiscence, and Motion Reveal the Limits of Honest Stability on Pharma Web sites, SSRN Digital Journal (2025). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5096917
Supplied by
George Mason College
Quotation:
Can smarter advertising and marketing assist ‘make America wholesome once more?’ (2025, September 15)
retrieved 15 September 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/information/2025-09-smarter-america-healthy.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Other than any truthful dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for info functions solely.
