We collect cookies to analyze our website traffic and performance; we never collect any personal data. Cookie Policy
Accept
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Defying Putin’s Nuclear Threat — Responsibly
Share
Font ResizerAa
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Follow US
NEW YORK DAWN™ > Blog > Trending > Defying Putin’s Nuclear Threat — Responsibly
Defying Putin’s Nuclear Threat — Responsibly
Trending

Defying Putin’s Nuclear Threat — Responsibly

Last updated: April 1, 2022 11:33 am
Editorial Board Published April 1, 2022
Share
SHARE
01simon stevenson2 facebookJumbo

Like the United States, Russia surely possesses tactical nuclear weapons, which have exponentially less power but could each still yield an explosion of 10 kilotons and potentially up to 50 kilotons of TNT (the Hiroshima bomb’s yield was about 15 kilotons) and would cover relatively short battlefield ranges. It has reportedly been building up its stockpile of these weapons. In issuing the nuclear threat, Mr. Putin implicitly raised a principle, known as “escalate to de-escalate,” under which Russian forces would use low-yield tactical nuclear weapons in Europe to pre-empt large-scale conventional action by NATO. The principle does not fit with any of the doctrinal scenarios above, but it is consistent with Moscow’s capabilities.

Tactical nuclear weapons are destabilizing to the delicate balance of deterrence. They reduce the barrier to nuclear use and blur the boundary between conventional and nuclear war. Russia’s nuclear threat is also most likely imparting additional momentum to the most troubling aspect of U.S. nuclear modernization plans: its own focus on tactical nuclear weapons. Abandoning the Obama administration’s apprehensiveness about such weapons because of their destabilizing effects, the Trump administration’s Nuclear Posture Review contemplated their development in response to the possibility of local and limited aggression — to some extent in response to Russian intimations that it would use the weapons pre-emptively.

If the United States doubled down on tactical nuclear weapons in response to Russia’s threat, it would return the world to a state of nuclear dread similar to what it experienced in the early 1980s. Instead, the United States should reassert confidence in conventional deterrence by emphasizing its adherence to the established framework.

The effort might start with a refutation of Mr. Putin’s narrative, which includes the idea that the invasion of Ukraine was undertaken to pre-empt NATO aggression against Russia staged from Ukraine. This is not credible. NATO’s posture is clearly defensive, involving small forward-positioned NATO deployments that function essentially as a tripwire and a multinational backup force for quick reinforcement to hold the line.

The Biden administration should dial back public disclosures of what it will not do militarily. Such talk implies that the United States and NATO do not believe in the alliance’s deterrence and buy into Mr. Putin’s suggestion that any level of NATO support for Ukraine would risk nuclear war. Putin’s own conduct implies that this isn’t true. Mr. Putin has drawn his red lines: no interference with Russia’s attempted absorption of Ukraine and no arms convoys. Yet the United States and NATO have trespassed over both red lines without facing a Russian riposte. Perpetuating a false sense of Russia’s readiness to use extreme measures only helps Mr. Putin.

Owing to Ukrainian forces’ stiff resistance and the West’s broad support for Ukraine, Russia may be cooling on military conquest and considering a negotiated political solution. Caution is still warranted: Mr. Putin’s true limits remain unclear. The United States should continue to send Ukraine military equipment, especially antiaircraft systems and antitank munitions.

At the same time, the United States and its allies should continue to firm up NATO’s conventional readiness to respond to Russian aggression against a NATO member or on NATO territory, whether it is a result of a deliberate decision or spillover from operations in Ukraine. The message to Mr. Putin is that the United States and NATO emphatically reject his attempt to raze the architecture of deterrence.

Jonathan Stevenson, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the managing editor of Survival, served on the National Security Council staff in the Obama administration and is the author of “Thinking Beyond the Unthinkable.” Steven Simon is a fellow at M.I.T. and an analyst with the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. He served in the State Department and on the National Security Council staff in Republican and Democratic administrations.

You Might Also Like

We’ve Cracked the Code to Reality — And It Changes Everything

India Leads the World in Climate Action with Historic Tree Plantation Record

Tenvil Mackenson: Rebuilding Haiti, Brick by Brick

Finding Voice Through Silence: The Story of OR GOLAN

The Landscape of International Trade in 2025: Constant Evolution and Strategic Shifts

TAGGED:Biden, Joseph R JrDefense and Military ForcesEuropeNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationNuclear WeaponsPutin, Vladimir VRussiaRussian Invasion of Ukraine (2022)The Washington MailUkraineUnited States International Relations
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow
Popular News
Newsom Calls for Gun Legislation Modeled on the Texas Abortion Law
Politics

Newsom Calls for Gun Legislation Modeled on the Texas Abortion Law

Editorial Board December 12, 2021
March Madness: St. Peter’s Beats Purdue to Reach the Elite 8
What Apple’s New Repair Program Means for You (and Your iPhone)
Jan. 6 Committee Seeks Interview With Kevin McCarthy
I noticed the rise and decline of YA literature from the within. Here is what it was like

You Might Also Like

Lara Rose’s Journey from Aspiring Trauma Surgeon to a Seven-Figure Earning Digital Entrepreneur
Trending

Lara Rose’s Journey from Aspiring Trauma Surgeon to a Seven-Figure Earning Digital Entrepreneur

May 27, 2025
Fashion Designer Hyeonseo Irene Park: Redefining Menswear Through Originality and Collaboration
FashionTrending

Fashion Designer Hyeonseo Irene Park: Redefining Menswear Through Originality and Collaboration

May 25, 2025
Beyond Relaxation: How Adam Cardona’s Elite Healers Sports Massage Transforms Recovery for Athletes and Everyday People
HealthTrending

Beyond Relaxation: How Adam Cardona’s Elite Healers Sports Massage Transforms Recovery for Athletes and Everyday People

May 24, 2025
The Evolution of Children’s Literature: Blending Traditional Values with Modern Themes
LifestyleTrending

The Evolution of Children’s Literature: Blending Traditional Values with Modern Themes

May 20, 2025

Categories

  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • World
  • Art

About US

New York Dawn is a proud and integral publication of the Enspirers News Group, embodying the values of journalistic integrity and excellence.
Company
  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • Accessibility Statement
Contact Us
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Term of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
© 2024 New York Dawn. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?