We collect cookies to analyze our website traffic and performance; we never collect any personal data. Cookie Policy
Accept
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Four Attorneys General Sue Google Over Privacy Claims
Share
Font ResizerAa
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Follow US
NEW YORK DAWN™ > Blog > Technology > Four Attorneys General Sue Google Over Privacy Claims
Four Attorneys General Sue Google Over Privacy Claims
Technology

Four Attorneys General Sue Google Over Privacy Claims

Last updated: January 24, 2022 7:40 pm
Editorial Board Published January 24, 2022
Share
SHARE
24econ brf google facebookJumbo

The District of Columbia and three states sued Google on Monday, claiming that the tech giant deceived consumers to gain access to their location data.

In separate lawsuits, the attorneys general of the district, Texas, Washington and Indiana claimed that Google misled users of Android phones and of tools like Google Maps and its search engine by continuing to track location information of users who had changed privacy settings to prevent the data collection.

Karl A. Racine, the attorney general for the District of Columbia, led the complaints after a three-year investigation, which was initiated after a report by The Associated Press showed that the company recorded users’ movements even when told not to. He said investigators had found that since at least 2014, Google made misleading and conflicting claims to consumers about privacy protections offered via its account settings.

The District of Columbia lawsuit alleged that even after users changed the settings in their account or device to stop location tracking, Google collected and stored that information through Google services, Wi-Fi data and marketing partners. The search giant also misled and pressured users to enable more location tracking, for example by claiming products would not function properly if the location services setting was disabled when in fact it was not needed to use the app, according to the suit.

“Google falsely led consumers to believe that changing their account and device settings would allow customers to protect their privacy and control what personal data the company could access,” Mr. Racine said in a statement. “The truth is that contrary to Google’s representations it continues to systematically surveil customers and profit from customer data.”

Google said that the allegations brought by the attorneys general were false and that it had put in place many changes to its privacy policies to help users protect their location data.

“The attorneys general are bringing a case based on inaccurate claims and outdated assertions about our settings,” said Jose Castaneda, a spokesman for Google. “We have always built privacy features into our products and provided robust controls for location data. We will vigorously defend ourselves and set the record straight.”

Google is also fighting an antitrust lawsuit led by Texas in which states have accused the company of obtaining and abusing a monopoly over the systems that allow publishers to auction off ad space to marketers. On Friday, Google asked a federal court to dismiss the lawsuit.

The lawsuits add to a mounting offensive by regulators to curtail the power and business practices of Silicon Valley giants like Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple. State and federal regulators have filed dozens of antitrust, consumer protection, privacy and trade lawsuits in an attempt to curb the business models or break up the companies. A Senate committee last week advanced potentially landmark antitrust legislation that tries to weaken the dominance of the internet giants.

Mr. Racine and the attorneys general of Texas, Washington and Indiana said their suits, filed under local consumer protection laws, sought to fine Google and to stop its practice of collecting location data collection for users who have opted out. The attorneys general also have joined in other antitrust lawsuits against Google for allegedly harming competition in search and advertising technology.

“Google has prioritized profits over people,” The Indiana attorney general, Todd Rokita, said. “It has prioritized financial earnings over following the law.”

You Might Also Like

AI denial is turning into an enterprise threat: Why dismissing “slop” obscures actual functionality positive factors

GAM takes purpose at “context rot”: A dual-agent reminiscence structure that outperforms long-context LLMs

The 'reality serum' for AI: OpenAI’s new technique for coaching fashions to admit their errors

Anthropic vs. OpenAI pink teaming strategies reveal completely different safety priorities for enterprise AI

Inside NetSuite’s subsequent act: Evan Goldberg on the way forward for AI-powered enterprise methods

TAGGED:Antitrust Laws and Competition IssuesAttorneys GeneralConsumer ProtectionData-Mining and Database MarketingGoogle IncPrivacyRacine, Karl ASuits and Litigation (Civil)The Washington Mail
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow
Popular News
Matthew Stafford saga, Aaron Rodgers’ future and Chiefs’ response to Tremendous Bowl loss amongst NFL offseason storylines
Sports

Matthew Stafford saga, Aaron Rodgers’ future and Chiefs’ response to Tremendous Bowl loss amongst NFL offseason storylines

Editorial Board February 20, 2025
White Home plan alerts “open-weight first” period—and enterprises want new guardrails
Malik Nabers: ‘I still stand on what I said’ after assembly with Joe Schoen, Brian Daboll to debate postgame criticism
Nineteenth-century Poor Regulation Modification Act linked to rising baby mortality
U.S. Intelligence Is Helping Ukraine Kill Russian Generals, Officials Say

You Might Also Like

Nvidia's new AI framework trains an 8B mannequin to handle instruments like a professional
Technology

Nvidia's new AI framework trains an 8B mannequin to handle instruments like a professional

December 4, 2025
Gong examine: Gross sales groups utilizing AI generate 77% extra income per rep
Technology

Gong examine: Gross sales groups utilizing AI generate 77% extra income per rep

December 4, 2025
AWS launches Kiro powers with Stripe, Figma, and Datadog integrations for AI-assisted coding
Technology

AWS launches Kiro powers with Stripe, Figma, and Datadog integrations for AI-assisted coding

December 4, 2025
Workspace Studio goals to unravel the true agent drawback: Getting staff to make use of them
Technology

Workspace Studio goals to unravel the true agent drawback: Getting staff to make use of them

December 4, 2025

Categories

  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Art
  • World

About US

New York Dawn is a proud and integral publication of the Enspirers News Group, embodying the values of journalistic integrity and excellence.
Company
  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • Accessibility Statement
Contact Us
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Term of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
© 2024 New York Dawn. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?