By STEPHEN GROVES, Related Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Home Oversight Committee on Tuesday publicly posted the information it has acquired from the Justice Division on the intercourse trafficking investigations into Jeffrey Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, responding to mounting strain in Congress to drive extra disclosure within the case.
Nonetheless, the information principally include data that was already publicly identified or obtainable. The folders contained a whole bunch of picture information of years-old courtroom filings associated to Epstein and Maxwell. In addition they included video information showing to be physique cam footage from police searches in addition to recordings and summaries of legislation enforcement interviews with victims detailing the abuse they stated they suffered.
The committee’s launch of the information confirmed how lawmakers are desirous to act as they return to Washington after a monthlong break. They rapidly revived a political conflict that has flummoxed Home Republican management and roiled President Donald Trump’s administration. Home Republican Speaker Mike Johnson is attempting to quell an effort by Democrats and a few Republicans to drive a vote on a invoice that might require the Justice Division to launch all the knowledge within the so-called Epstein information, except for the victims’ private data.
Survivors meet with lawmakers
On Capitol Hill Tuesday, Johnson and a bipartisan group of lawmakers met with survivors of abuse by Epstein and Maxwell.
“The objective here is not just to uncover, investigate the Epstein evils, but also to ensure that this never happens again and ultimately to find out why justice has been delayed for these ladies for so very long,” stated Johnson, R-La., after he emerged from a two-hour assembly with six of the survivors.
“It is inexcusable. And it will stop now because the Congress is dialed in on this,” he added.
However there are nonetheless intense disagreements on how lawmakers ought to proceed. Johnson is urgent for the inquiry to be dealt with by the Home Oversight Committee and supporting the committee because it releases its findings.
What’s within the launched information
The information launched Tuesday included audio of an Epstein worker describing to a legislation enforcement official how “there were a lot of girls that were very, very young” visiting the house however couldn’t say for certain in the event that they had been minors.
Over the course of Epstein’s visits to the house, the person stated, greater than a dozen ladies would possibly go to, and he was charged with cleansing the room the place Epstein had massages, twice day by day.
Among the interviews with officers from the Palm Seashore Police Division date to 2005, in response to timestamps learn out by officers at first of the information.
Most, if not all, of the textual content paperwork posted Tuesday had already been public. Notably, the possible trigger affidavit and different information from the 2005 investigation into Epstein contained a notation indicating that they’d been beforehand launched in a 2017 public information request. An web search confirmed these information had been posted to the web site of the Palm Seashore County State Legal professional’s Workplace in July 2017.
Rep. Robert Garcia, the highest Democrat on the Home Oversight Committee, chided Republicans on the panel for releasing materials that he stated consisted nearly completely of already obtainable data.
“The 33,000 pages of Epstein documents James Comer has decided to ‘release’ were already mostly public information. To the American people — don’t let this fool you,” Garcia stated in an announcement.
Push for disclosure continues
If the aim of the discharge was to offer solutions to a public nonetheless curious over the lengthy concluded instances, the uncooked mechanics of the clunky rollout made {that a} problem.
Lawmakers at 6 p.m. launched hundreds of pages and movies through a cumbersome Google Drive, leaving it to readers and viewers to decipher new and attention-grabbing tidbits on their very own. The disclosure additionally left open the query of why the Justice Division didn’t launch the fabric on to the general public as a substitute of working by Capitol Hill.
In the meantime, Democrats and a few Republicans had been nonetheless attempting to maneuver round Johnson’s management of the Home ground to carry a vote on their invoice to require the Justice Division to publicly launch information. Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who’s main the maneuver, spoke confidently that he would have the ability to acquire assist from at the very least a handful of Republicans, in addition to all Democrats, so as to drive a vote.
If Massie, who’s urgent for the invoice alongside Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., is profitable in forcing a vote — which might take weeks — the laws would nonetheless have to move the Senate and be signed into legislation by Trump.
The conflict suggests little has modified in Congress since late July, when Johnson despatched lawmakers house early in hopes of cooling the political battle over the Epstein case. Members of each events stay dissatisfied and are demanding extra particulars on the years-old investigation into Epstein, the rich and well-connected financier whose 2019 dying in a New York jail cell whereas he confronted intercourse trafficking costs has sparked wide-ranging conspiracy theories and hypothesis.
“We continue to bring the pressure. We’re not going to stop until we get justice for all of the survivors and the victims,” Garcia informed reporters.
Related Press writers Eric Tucker and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington, Mike Sisak in New York and Meg Kinnard in Chapin, South Carolina, contributed.
