We collect cookies to analyze our website traffic and performance; we never collect any personal data. Cookie Policy
Accept
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: How Abortion Rights Supporters Won in Kansas
Share
Font ResizerAa
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Follow US
NEW YORK DAWN™ > Blog > Trending > How Abortion Rights Supporters Won in Kansas
How Abortion Rights Supporters Won in Kansas
Trending

How Abortion Rights Supporters Won in Kansas

Last updated: August 3, 2022 3:16 pm
Editorial Board Published August 3, 2022
Share
SHARE
02primary live kansas abortion keypoints 3 facebookJumbo

Supporters of abortion rights won a huge and surprising victory on Tuesday in one of the most conservative states in the country, with Kansas voters resoundingly rejecting a constitutional amendment that would have let state legislators ban or significantly restrict abortion.

Results were still coming in as the night wore on, but with more than 90 percent of ballots counted, the pro-abortion-rights side was ahead by about 18 percentage points, a staggering margin in a state that voted for President Donald J. Trump in 2020 by a margin of just under 15 percentage points.

Here is a look at what happened.

Abortion opponents underperformed even in conservative areas.

Going into Election Day, many observers believed the outcome of the referendum would be determined in increasingly Democratic areas like the Kansas City suburbs — that is, by whether enough voters turned out there to compensate for the very conservative lean of the rest of the state. But abortion opponents did surprisingly poorly even in the reddest places.

Consider far western Kansas, a rural region along the Colorado border that votes overwhelmingly Republican. In Hamilton County, which voted 81 percent for Mr. Trump in 2020, less than 56 percent chose the anti-abortion position on Tuesday (with about 90 percent of the vote counted there). In Greeley County, which voted more than 85 percent for Mr. Trump, only about 60 percent chose the anti-abortion position.

We can talk about the cities all day long, but Kansas is known as a rural Republican state for a reason: Rural Republican areas cover enough of the state that they can, and almost always do, outvote the cities. The rejection of the amendment has as much to do with lukewarm support in the reddest counties as it does with strong opposition in the bluest ones.

Yes, the swing areas swung left.

Certainly, though, the cities and suburbs deserve some credit. The comparatively slim margins of victory for abortion opponents in western Kansas left the door wide open, but abortion rights supporters still had to walk through it, and they did.

Wyandotte County, home to Kansas City, Kan., voted 65 percent for Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2020, but 74 percent for abortion rights on Tuesday. Neighboring Johnson County, the state’s most populous, voted 53 percent for Mr. Biden but more than 68 percent for abortion rights.

What was striking, in fact, was the degree to which the picture was similar everywhere. From the bluest counties to the reddest ones, abortion rights performed better than Mr. Biden, and opposition to abortion performed worse than Mr. Trump.

Turnout was high.

We won’t know exactly how many people voted, much less their partisan breakdown or demographic characteristics, until the results are fully counted. But we can already say that statewide turnout was much higher than expected — nearly as high as it was in the last midterm election.

Roughly 940,000 Kansans voted in the referendum, according to preliminary New York Times estimates, compared with about 1.05 million people in the November 2018 midterm election. The gap between turnout in primaries and general elections is usually much larger than that.

Before Tuesday, the Kansas secretary of state’s office predicted turnout of about 36 percent. But as voting ended, Secretary of State Scott Schwab told reporters that anecdotal evidence indicated turnout might hit 50 percent, an extraordinary increase over what was expected. The Times’s 940,000 estimate would mean 49 percent turnout.

The voters who would have been expected to show up on Tuesday, under normal circumstances, would mostly have been Republicans. That is not only because registered Republicans significantly outnumber registered Democrats in Kansas, but also because most of the contested races on the ballot were Republican primaries, giving Democrats little reason to vote — except to oppose the constitutional amendment.

The Supreme Court scrambled abortion opponents’ calculus.

Abortion opponents’ strategic decisions around the amendment started with the choice to put it on Tuesday’s ballot in the first place. The primary electorate was expected to be small and disproportionately Republican, and it seemed like a reasonable supposition that the amendment would have a better chance of passing in that environment than on a general election ballot.

The overturning of Roe v. Wade in June upended that strategy, turning what might otherwise have been an under-the-radar ballot measure into a nationally scrutinized referendum on abortion rights. Many voters might previously have seen the stakes as theoretical: If the U.S. Constitution protected abortion rights, how much did it really matter whether the Kansas Constitution did? But then the Supreme Court undid the first part of that equation, and Kansas abruptly became an island of abortion access in a sea of Southern and Plains states banning the procedure.

Groups on both sides blanketed the state with millions of dollars in advertising. Democrats who would otherwise have stayed home, knowing their party had few competitive primaries on the ballot, turned out specifically to vote against the amendment. Supporters of abortion rights were gripped with that great political motivator: anger.

On Tuesday, the results were clear.

You Might Also Like

The Evolution of Children’s Literature: Blending Traditional Values with Modern Themes

TLI Ranked Highest-Rated 3PL on Google Reviews

From Pattaya to the World: Bryan Flowers’ Unstoppable Rise as a Global Entrepreneur

Triumph Over Adversity: Alex Martinez’s Inspiring Journey from Major Surgery to Amazon Success

Exploring the Impact of Boardsi’s New Board Suite Through the Eyes of CEO Martin Rowinski

TAGGED:AbortionElectionsKansasMidterm Elections (2022)Politics and GovernmentThe Washington Mail
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow
Popular News
Liev Schreiber speaks out in assist of 16-year-old trans daughter Kai
New York

Liev Schreiber speaks out in assist of 16-year-old trans daughter Kai

Editorial Board May 9, 2025
Distinct driving patterns seen for seniors with main depressive dysfunction
Evaluation: William Kentridge’s ‘The Nice Sure’ on the Wallis: A stunning meditation on a world out of kilter
Parkinson’s drug adjustments the intestine microbiome for the more serious as a result of iron deficiency, examine reveals
Researchers advocate new normal of look after households with hereditary neuroblastoma linked to ALK mutation

You Might Also Like

The Silent Weight of Privilege: Depression, Anhedonia, and the Psychoneuroimmunology of the 1%
LifestyleTrending

The Silent Weight of Privilege: Depression, Anhedonia, and the Psychoneuroimmunology of the 1%

May 7, 2025
WedeCanada MasterClass: The Ethiopian Movement Redefining How People Apply for Canadian Visas
TravelTrending

WedeCanada MasterClass: The Ethiopian Movement Redefining How People Apply for Canadian Visas

April 26, 2025
Astana International Forum 2025: “Connecting Minds, Shaping the Future”
BusinessTrending

Astana International Forum 2025: “Connecting Minds, Shaping the Future”

April 9, 2025
Tanvir Receives Clean Chit from Court: All Allegations Declared Baseless and Politically Motivated
TrendingWorld

Tanvir Receives Clean Chit from Court: All Allegations Declared Baseless and Politically Motivated

April 1, 2025

Categories

  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • World
  • Art

About US

New York Dawn is a proud and integral publication of the Enspirers News Group, embodying the values of journalistic integrity and excellence.
Company
  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • Accessibility Statement
Contact Us
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Term of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
© 2024 New York Dawn. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?