President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Vladimir Fortov, proper, returns a Nobel prize medal which was bought at public sale to a Russian businessman, to U.S. Nobel laureate, biologist James Watson within the Russian Academy of Sciences, in Moscow, Russia, Wednesday, June 17, 2015. Credit score: AP Picture/Ivan Sekretarev, File
On a foggy Saturday morning in 1953, a tall, skinny 24-year-old man fiddled with shapes he had reduce out of cardboard. They represented fragments of a DNA molecule, and younger James Watson was attempting to determine how they match collectively in a approach that allow DNA do its job because the stuff of genes.
Instantly, he realized that they joined collectively to type the “rungs” of an extended, twisted ladder, a form higher identified these days as a double helix.
His first response: “It’s so beautiful.”
However it was greater than that. Discovering the construction of deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, was a breakthrough that might assist open the way in which to a revolution in drugs, biology and different fields as numerous as crime-fighting, family tree and ethics.
Watson died Thursday, in accordance with his former analysis lab. The Chicago-born scientist was 97 years previous. His profession was marked by important achievements, together with his position in mapping the human genome. Nonetheless, his legacy is difficult by controversial remarks on race, which led to his condemnation and lack of honorary titles.
Determining the double helix “goes down as one of the three most important discoveries in the history of biology,” alongside Charles Darwin’s principle of evolution by way of pure choice and Gregor Mendel’s basic legal guidelines of genetics, stated Bruce Stillman, president of the Chilly Spring Harbor lab, on Friday.
Watson shared the Nobel Prize with collaborator Francis Crick and scientist Maurice Wilkins. They had been aided by X-ray analysis by colleague Rosalind Franklin and her graduate pupil Raymond Gosling. Watson was later criticized for a disparaging portrayal of Franklin in his ebook “The Double Helix,” and in the present day she is taken into account a distinguished instance of a feminine scientist whose contributions had been missed.
U.S. biologist James Watson, who shared a Nobel prize for serving to uncover the double-helix form of the DNA molecule, poses for a portrait at an exhibition in Berlin on Monday, Oct. 11, 2004. Credit score: AP Picture/Markus Schreiber, File
Each of his Nobel co-winners, Crick and Wilkins, died in 2004. Franklin died in 1958.
Their discovery immediately advised how hereditary data is saved and the way a cell duplicates its DNA earlier than dividing so that every ensuing cell inherits a replica. The duplication begins with the 2 strands of DNA pulling aside like a zipper.
“Francis Crick and I made the discovery of the century, that was pretty clear,” Watson as soon as stated. He additionally wrote: “There was no way we could have foreseen the explosive impact of the double helix on science and society.”
Amongst non-scientists, the double helix has grow to be an immediately acknowledged image of science. And for researchers, it helped open the door to newer developments equivalent to tinkering with the genetic make-up of residing issues, treating illness by inserting genes into sufferers, figuring out human stays and felony suspects from DNA samples and tracing household timber.
That in flip has raised a bunch of moral questions, equivalent to whether or not we ought to be altering an individual’s genome in a approach that’s transmitted to at least one’s offspring.
Watson’s preliminary motivation for supporting the gene challenge was private: His son Rufus had been hospitalized with a doable analysis of schizophrenia, and Watson figured that figuring out the whole make-up of DNA can be essential for understanding that illness, perhaps in time to assist his son.
Watson by no means made one other lab discovering as huge because the double helix. However within the many years that adopted, he wrote influential textbooks and a best-selling memoir, picked out vivid younger scientists and helped them. And he used his status and contacts to affect science coverage.
U.S. Nobel laureate, biologist James Watson speaks on the Russian Academy of Sciences, in Moscow, Russia, Wednesday, June 17, 2015. Credit score: AP Picture/Ivan Sekretarev, File
But he gained unwelcome consideration in 2007 when the Sunday Instances Journal of London quoted him as saying he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” as a result of “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—where all the testing says not really.” He stated that whereas he hopes everyone seems to be equal, “people who have to deal with Black employees find this is not true.”
He apologized, however after a global furor he was suspended from his job as chancellor of the Chilly Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York. He retired every week later. He had served in numerous management jobs there for practically 40 years.
“I only wish that Jim’s views on society and humanity could have matched his brilliant scientific insights.” Dr. Francis Collins, then-director of the Nationwide Institutes of Well being, stated in 2019.
In a tv documentary that yr, Watson was requested if his views had modified. “No, not at all,” he stated.
In response, the Chilly Spring Harbor lab revoked a number of honorary titles it had given Watson, saying his statements had been “reprehensible” and “unsupported by science.”
© 2025 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials might not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.
Quotation:
James Watson helped crack DNA’s code, sparking medical advances and moral debates (2025, November 8)
retrieved 8 November 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/information/2025-11-james-watson-dna-code-medical.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Other than any honest dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for data functions solely.
