We collect cookies to analyze our website traffic and performance; we never collect any personal data. Cookie Policy
Accept
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Judge Issues Stinging Free Speech Ruling Against University of Florida
Share
Font ResizerAa
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Follow US
NEW YORK DAWN™ > Blog > Trending > Judge Issues Stinging Free Speech Ruling Against University of Florida
Judge Issues Stinging Free Speech Ruling Against University of Florida
Trending

Judge Issues Stinging Free Speech Ruling Against University of Florida

Last updated: January 22, 2022 1:45 am
Editorial Board Published January 22, 2022
Share
SHARE
21Florida profs01 facebookJumbo

WASHINGTON — A federal judge handed a crucial free-speech victory to six University of Florida professors Friday, ordering the university to stop enforcing a policy that had barred them from giving expert testimony in lawsuits against the state.

The stinging ruling, by Judge Mark E. Walker of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, accused the university of trying to silence the professors for fear that their testimony would anger state officials and legislators who control the school’s funding. Judge Walker likened that to the decision last month by Hong Kong University to remove a 25-foot sculpture marking the 1989 massacre of student protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square by the Chinese military, apparently for fear of riling the authoritarian Chinese government.

If the comparison distressed university officials, he wrote, “the solution is simple. Stop acting like your contemporaries in Hong Kong.”

A university spokeswoman, Hessy Fernandez, said school officials would review the order before deciding whether to appeal it.

Technically, the 74-page order limits the university only temporarily, until there is a ruling in the professors’ lawsuit challenging the policy. But the judge, who was appointed in 2012 by President Barack Obama, left scant doubt that his opinion of the school’s conduct was unlikely to change, stating that the evidence on the “defendants’ side of the scale sits empty; plaintiffs’ overflows.”

On its face, Judge Walker said, the school’s policy violated the First Amendment by silencing professors who were critical of the state but letting others speak freely, a violation known as viewpoint discrimination.

The order was a turning point in a dispute that has tarred the reputation of one of the nation’s leading public universities and sparked an investigation by the body that accredits it. It also has fueled criticism of Governor Ron DeSantis, a Republican, who has denied pressuring the school to rein in faculty conduct that questions his administration’s policies.

And it has uncovered a trove of evidence that, despite university officials’ flat denial that they felt political pressure, faculty members did. In a report issued last fall, the Faculty Senate complained of “palpable reticence and even fear,” alleging that some school employees had been warned “not to criticize the Governor of Florida or UF policies related to Covid-19 in media interactions,” and that barriers had been raised to publishing data on the pandemic.

Among many other charges, the report also said some faculty had been told not to use the words “critical” and “race” in the same sentence, a reference to the fever on the right over critical race theory.

A lawyer for the professors, David O’Neil, called the ruling “a resounding victory.”

“I think the judge recognized what the university is doing for what it is: an effort to bring a state university under the control of the ruling party in state government,” he said. “If the First Amendment means anything, it means that government can’t pick and choose what speech is permitted based on its viewpoint.”

Three political science professors brought the lawsuit in October after university officials rejected their requests to act as expert witnesses for plaintiffs challenging the state’s restrictive new voting law. They were later joined by a pediatrics professor who had been barred from testifying in a lawsuit challenging Mr. DeSantis’s executive order withholding funds from schools that enforced mask mandates.

Two law professors also joined the suit, saying they had been barred from signing a court brief in a lawsuit against the state unless they hid their affiliation with the school.

Each was told that the actions violated a new conflict-of-interest policy that limited school employees’ involvement in matters “adverse to UF’s interests” — in these cases, opposing the state government of which the university is a part — even though they were acting as private individuals, on their own time.

Judge Walker called that reasoning “shocking.”

“And what are UF’s interests?” he wrote. “Why must Defendants regulate Plaintiffs’ speech? How does Plaintiffs’ speech prevent the efficient delivery of government services, impair discipline, workplace harmony or employer confidence?

“Despite being given not one, not two, but four chances to articulate either in writing or at oral argument how Plaintiffs’ speech disrupts UF’s mission, Defendants cannot or will not say.”

In court, lawyers for the university argued that the professors’ challenge was moot because the university had lifted the bans on their lawsuit testimony in November and rewritten the conflict policy to make future such bans more difficult.

But the judge rejected that, noting that the school had not agreed to stop censoring faculty members’ testimony and that the chair of the school’s board of trustees, Morteza Hosseini, indicated little had changed. In remarks to the board last month, Mr. Hosseini said faculty members performing outside work could be neglecting their duties and misusing university funds, and were taking advantage of their positions “to improperly advocate personal political viewpoints to the exclusion of others.”

“It must stop, and it will stop,” he said. “Let me tell you, our legislators are not going to put up with the wasting of state money and resources, and neither is this board.”

You Might Also Like

Debut Novel The Revenant’s Mark Blends Revolutionary War History with Dark Fantasy in a Haunting Tale of Resurrection and Reckoning

GARI Emerges as a Global Leader in Research Mentorship and Scholarly InnovationAustin, Texas

“A Family’s Fight to Reclaim Their Legacy”

Streamline, Scale, Succeed: Why Global Enterprises Are Moving to Odoo ERP

Beloved Children’s Book 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒑 𝑴𝒚 𝑴𝒐𝒎𝒔 𝑮𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝑴𝒆 Returns to Best-Seller Status Years After Its Release — and Fans Are Begging for More

TAGGED:Colleges and UniversitiesDecisions and VerdictsDeSantis, RonFloridaFreedom of Speech and ExpressionPolitics and GovernmentSuits and Litigation (Civil)The Washington MailUniversity of FloridaWalker, Mark E (1967- )
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow
Popular News
Africa’s making progress towards HIV, however donor funds are drying up—what should change
Health

Africa’s making progress towards HIV, however donor funds are drying up—what should change

Editorial Board November 30, 2024
Missouri State Lawmakers Revise Their Dress Code for Women
New Yorkers say new Pope Leo, first American pontiff, is a blessing for metropolis and nation
Gerrit Cole, Max Fried talking the identical language atop Yankees’ rotation
The Metaverse’s Dark Side: Here Come Harassment and Assaults

You Might Also Like

Model With a Mission: In Conversation With Maurice Giovanni
EntertainmentTrending

Model With a Mission: In Conversation With Maurice Giovanni

June 22, 2025
AI Architecture Pioneer: How Abdul Muqtadir Mohammed Is Reshaping Cloud, Code, and Supply Chains
TechnologyTrending

AI Architecture Pioneer: How Abdul Muqtadir Mohammed Is Reshaping Cloud, Code, and Supply Chains

June 17, 2025
Global Security and Health Resilience: How AI-Driven Systems Could Reinvent National Safety—And the Visionary Behind the Shift
Trending

Global Security and Health Resilience: How AI-Driven Systems Could Reinvent National Safety—And the Visionary Behind the Shift

June 16, 2025
How AI Is Being Used to Enforce Modern Kleptocracy
TechnologyTrending

How AI Is Being Used to Enforce Modern Kleptocracy

June 16, 2025

Categories

  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • World
  • Art

About US

New York Dawn is a proud and integral publication of the Enspirers News Group, embodying the values of journalistic integrity and excellence.
Company
  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • Accessibility Statement
Contact Us
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Term of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
© 2024 New York Dawn. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?