A portrait of late Indian artist Maqbool Fida (M.F.) Husain (photograph through Wikimedia Commons)
Two drawings by the famend late Indian artist Maqbool Fida (M.F.) Husain on the Delhi Artwork Gallery (DAG) in New Delhi’s Connaught Place had been seized on courtroom orders on January 22, after a customer affiliated with town’s courtroom system filed a authorized criticism alleging that the works had been offensive.
One of many drawings in query depict the elephant god Ganesh with a nude lady seated on his knee, and the opposite options an apparently nude rendition of the monkey god Hanuman holding a unadorned lady in his hand together with his tail wrapped across the neck of an assailant.
In an announcement shared with Hyperallergic, a spokesperson for DAG wrote that given its “implicit belief in artistic freedom, [the gallery] denies any wrongdoing as alleged by the complainant who has publicly claimed to be principally driven by a religious agenda.”
The gallery spokesperson added that the gallery was compliant with all elements of the investigation, together with handing over safety digicam footage in addition to different proof upon request.
Certainly one of two artworks that Amita Sachdeva filed a criticism about (screenshot Hyperallergic through @SachdevaAmita on X)
Amita Sachdeva, an advocate for the Delhi Excessive Courtroom, publicized her criticism on X after visiting the solo presentation Husain: The Timeless Modernist on the gallery early final December, a few week earlier than the exhibition was slated to shut. She included images of each the “offensive paintings” in her submit and alleged that the gallery had eliminated the works from show and claimed that they had been by no means exhibited by the point an investigating officer responded to the criticism.
Sachdeva’s biography entry on her X account notes that she “will pursue legal action against anyone who insults Sanatan Dharma,” referring to the basic non secular duties anticipated of all Hindus. In her criticism, she alleged that the works violated Clause 299 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the official felony code of India that solely got here into impact in July 2024, changing the centuries-old Indian Penal Code that was in place since 1860. Clause 299 refers to “deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.”
The second art work in Sachdeva’s criticism (screenshot Hyperallergic through @SachdevaAmita on X)
Although he was raised Muslim, Husain infused his inventive observe with a visible curiosity for different non secular faiths and maintained his dedication to inventive freedom. Whereas he was among the many highest paid, nationally awarded, and most revered artists of India, he was additionally broadly criticized for his portrayals of nudity and sexuality amongst Hindu goddesses all through his art work.
A associated sequence of Husain’s works from the Seventies had been reprinted in a 1996 article known as “M.F. Husain: A Painter or A Butcher?” that reignited a flurry of obscenity lawsuits, demise threats from Hindu nationalists, and bodily assaults on his gallery reveals and residential. Husain left India in 2006 in self-exile, and shuttled between Qatar and London till he died in 2011 on the age of 95.
Although the decide presiding over the case allowed investigating officers to proceed with seizing the 2 works on Wednesday, January 22, he quickly dismissed the applying for a written police doc initiating a felony investigation, citing {that a} “cognizable offence could not be ascertained.” Due to this fact, Sachdeva might proceed with a criticism case transferring ahead, however the matter doesn’t warrant any additional investigation from the state.
“DAG strongly opposes the complainant’s unfounded allegations and shall call out her attempt to launch a malicious prosecution against [the gallery], when called upon by the court to do so,” the gallery spokesperson shared in an up to date assertion despatched to Hyperallergic. “DAG also intends to pursue its own legal remedies against the complainant for the false and mala fide accusations made by her.”
It’s not but clear whether or not Husain’s drawings have been or will probably be returned to the gallery. Sachdeva didn’t reply to Hyperallergic‘s request for remark.
