Verasense is a wi-fi, single-use sensor that measures real-time load, stability, and surgical alignment of the knee throughout complete knee substitute, offering surgeons with information to optimize implant positioning and delicate tissue stability. Chapman labored on the gadget as a Ph.D. scholar at Dartmouth School and accomplished it at URI. Credit score: URI
Joint substitute surgical procedure has superior dramatically because of new supplies, methods, and know-how. Procedures are safer, much less invasive, and require much less restoration time. There have additionally been nice developments in know-how used to remotely monitor how sufferers recuperate from joint substitute surgical procedure, also referred to as arthroplasty. Nonetheless, these applied sciences haven’t but been extensively applied.
On the College of Rhode Island, Ryan Chapman, assistant professor of kinesiology within the School of Well being Sciences, is creating orthopedic applied sciences to enhance affected person outcomes. Chapman and colleague Professor Janie Astephen Wilson of Dalhousie College in Halifax, Canada examined the state of know-how used for distant affected person monitoring following joint substitute.
Their peer-reviewed article is printed within the Journal of Orthopaedic Analysis.
Developments in know-how
Sensors can now be embedded in implants throughout knee substitute surgical procedure and can be utilized for gait and cargo sensing, exercise monitoring, and implant micromotion detection. Chapman and his collaborators developed a tool for implants which makes use of a gyroscope-based system to measure the alignment of the tibia coronal airplane in knee replacements.
Rising applied sciences for post-surgery monitoring embrace cell purposes, wearable sensors for mobility and temperature sensing, sensible textiles, and sensor-enabled sensible properties.
“Together, these technologies hold promise for more personalized, cost-effective strategies for comprehensive and patient-centered assessments that can inform tailored rehabilitation approaches, allow for near real-time assessment of patient outcomes, improve function, and promote earlier mobilization,” wrote Chapman and Astephen.
Chapman has established himself as a number one skilled within the improvement of wearable movement sensors for monitoring affected person restoration after joint replacements, incomes patents for his novel know-how and publishing a number of articles on using these applied sciences in monitoring restoration after knee, hip, and shoulder replacements.
Chapman offered his lab’s developments in wearable movement sensing in joint substitute on the Worldwide Society for Expertise in Arthroplasty annual assembly in September in Rome, Italy.
As procedures enhance, tech follows
In line with Chapman, there are a number of the explanation why the sector of orthopedics has been sluggish to undertake e-health applied sciences for distant affected person monitoring in comparison with different medical fields.

Motionsense is a wearable sensor platform that repeatedly tracks affected person motion and exercise after orthopedic procedures, offering real-world information on restoration and performance. MotionSense was created at URI and co-developed by Stryker, a medical know-how firm. Credit score: College of Rhode Island
“The plastic used in joint replacements used to break down rapidly inside the patient,” mentioned Chapman.
“Until that problem was solved, it didn’t make sense to spend lots of time, money, and energy on remotely monitoring patients. Moreover, when joint replacements failed, it was often multivariable. Developing a technology to remotely monitor a variety of variables was challenging.”
Now that joint replacements last more and sufferers can resume an lively life-style sooner, individuals are opting to have procedures at an earlier age and are beginning to embrace know-how used for post-surgery distant monitoring.
“The average age of individuals receiving joint replacements is 65 to 75,” mentioned Chapman.
“This demographic was historically significantly less interested in using technology to track their progress after a surgery. Now, that age range is starting to come down and individuals receiving joint replacements are far more technologically literate and accepting. As a result, we are beginning to see increased use of these remote monitoring technologies.”
Boundaries to beat
Regardless of advances in know-how, Chapman and Astephen make the case that earlier than distant arthroplasty monitoring applied sciences will be extensively accessible and generally used, a number of obstacles must be addressed.
Inconsistent protocols, the necessity for scientific validation, reliance on affected person compliance with sensor use, privateness issues, value challenges, and restricted long-term information are among the points that require additional analysis and viable options.
“Each of those problems require subtly different, but also interrelated solutions,” mentioned Chapman.
“For example, sensor compliance means we need patients to follow protocols to use the technology appropriately. This may require incentivization, which could vary from one person to another. One patient might have internal motivation, a second may be driven by what their doctor says, and a third may be driven by playing a rehabilitation game.”
Getting sufferers to embrace the know-how typically comes all the way down to its performance and design, which presents different challenges.
“Design choices for the sensors could change the cost, how we deploy it clinically, and if insurers are willing to pay for the technology,” mentioned Chapman.
“Cost and reimbursement challenges are highly dependent on the companies, insurers, and the government. Perhaps more important is the value of the technology in improving patient outcomes. If patients show significant improvement for equal or lower cost, the likelihood of adoption will increase.”
Relying on the know-how chosen, prices can vary from lots of of {dollars} for a disposable wearable sensor as much as tens of 1000’s of {dollars} for home-integrated sensing methods, making many of those applied sciences cost-prohibitive within the absence of insurance coverage or different reimbursement methods.
Chapman hopes his analysis staff’s efforts to develop these distant monitoring applied sciences will proceed driving well being care worth by enhancing affected person outcomes and enhance entry to high-quality well being care world wide.
Extra data:
Janie L. Astephen Wilson et al, Reimagining Outcomes: A Perspective Evaluate of Advances in Distant Monitoring Applied sciences in Submit‐Arthroplasty Affected person Care, Journal of Orthopaedic Analysis (2025). DOI: 10.1002/jor.70064
Supplied by
College of Rhode Island
Quotation:
Professor examines use of know-how to watch sufferers after joint substitute (2025, October 7)
retrieved 7 October 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/information/2025-10-professor-technology-patients-joint.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Aside from any truthful dealing for the aim of personal research or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for data functions solely.

