We collect cookies to analyze our website traffic and performance; we never collect any personal data. Cookie Policy
Accept
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Supreme Court Rejects Case on Juror Said to Harbor Racial Bias
Share
Font ResizerAa
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Follow US
NEW YORK DAWN™ > Blog > Politics > Supreme Court Rejects Case on Juror Said to Harbor Racial Bias
Supreme Court Rejects Case on Juror Said to Harbor Racial Bias
Politics

Supreme Court Rejects Case on Juror Said to Harbor Racial Bias

Last updated: April 18, 2022 4:59 pm
Editorial Board Published April 18, 2022
Share
SHARE
merlin 205408305 52563f70 3f58 4a32 ba6e cb2dd09c49cf facebookJumbo

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal from a death row inmate in Texas who said his jury had been tainted by racial bias. The inmate, Kristopher Love, a Black man, had objected to the seating of a juror who had said he believed “nonwhite races” to be the “more violent races.”

The court’s three liberal members dissented, saying the Supreme Court should have instructed the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state’s highest court for criminal matters, to reconsider Mr. Love’s challenge.

“When racial bias infects a jury in a capital case, it deprives a defendant of his right to an impartial tribunal in a life-or-death context,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, joined by Justices Stephen G. Breyer and Elena Kagan.

The majority, following the court’s standard practice, gave no reasons for refusing to hear Mr. Love’s appeal.

Mr. Love was convicted of committing a murder for hire. As part of jury selection in his case, prospective jurors filled out a questionnaire that asked, among other things, “Do you believe that some races and/or ethnic groups tend to be more violent than others?”

The prospective juror in question, who is white, said yes. He added an explanation: “Statistics show more violent crimes are committed by certain races. I believe in statistics.”

He elaborated when he was questioned by the lawyers in the case, saying he based his views on “news reports and criminology classes” rather than his “personal feelings toward one race or another.” The prospective juror added that he did not “think because of somebody’s race they’re more likely to commit a crime than somebody of a different race” and that he would not feel differently about Mr. Love “because he’s an African American.”

Mr. Love’s lawyers asked the judge to strike the prospective juror for cause, but the judge declined. Mr. Love had exhausted his peremptory challenges, and the juror was seated.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that Mr. Love could not contest the judge’s decision to seat the juror because the judge had earlier granted Mr. Love two extra peremptory challenges. Mr. Love had used those challenges before the juror at issue was questioned.

Justice Sotomayor wrote that “a previously used peremptory strike does not eliminate the need to inquire into the juror’s bias.”

She said that the state appeals court should grapple with whether Mr. Love’s right to an impartial jury had been violated.

“Biases capable of destroying a jury’s impartiality can take many forms,” she wrote. “Whatever the nature of the bias, if a trial court seats a juror who harbors a disqualifying prejudice, the resulting judgment must be reversed.”

Justice Sotomayor added that the questioning of potential jurors played an important role in the effort “to cleanse our jury system of racial bias.”

“Safeguards like this, however, are futile if courts do not even consider claims of racial bias that litigants bring forward,” she wrote. “The task of reviewing the record to determine whether a juror was fair and impartial is challenging, but it must be undertaken, especially when a person’s life is on the line.”

You Might Also Like

Choose orders Trump administration to enhance circumstances for migrants detained in NYC

Trump teases Kennedy Middle honorees, dangles his title to switch JFK’s

Mamdani ‘anti-Trump’ tour places stress on high Democrats to again his NYC mayoral bid

Mamdani calls on Cuomo to launch listing of consulting purchasers in new marketing campaign video

US nationwide debt reaches a report $37 trillion, the Treasury Division studies

TAGGED:Black PeopleJury SystemRace and EthnicitySupreme Court (US)The Washington Mail
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow
Popular News
20 One-Piece Swimsuits as Low as  to Snatch Up Now
Lifestyle

20 One-Piece Swimsuits as Low as $25 to Snatch Up Now

Editorial Board July 17, 2025
SWiRL: The enterprise case for AI that thinks like your finest problem-solvers
Devin 1.2: Up to date AI engineer enhances coding with smarter in-context reasoning, voice integration
Not simply hype — listed here are real-world use instances for AI brokers
California provides $25 reward playing cards to spice up chicken flu testing

You Might Also Like

Former Mayor Adams aide Mohamed Bahi pleads responsible in straw donor scheme
Politics

Former Mayor Adams aide Mohamed Bahi pleads responsible in straw donor scheme

August 12, 2025
Mayor Adams pushes again towards Trump’s menace to ship Nationwide Guard to NYC
Politics

Mayor Adams pushes again towards Trump’s menace to ship Nationwide Guard to NYC

August 12, 2025
Trump and Putin’s Alaska summit: Every part we all know
Politics

Trump and Putin’s Alaska summit: Every part we all know

August 12, 2025
Cuomo says rent-stabilized tenants ought to pay at the least 30% of their revenue in lease
Politics

Cuomo says rent-stabilized tenants ought to pay at the least 30% of their revenue in lease

August 11, 2025

Categories

  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • World
  • Art

About US

New York Dawn is a proud and integral publication of the Enspirers News Group, embodying the values of journalistic integrity and excellence.
Company
  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • Accessibility Statement
Contact Us
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Term of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
© 2024 New York Dawn. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?