We collect cookies to analyze our website traffic and performance; we never collect any personal data. Cookie Policy
Accept
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: What a Reckoning at the Supreme Court Could Look Like
Share
Font ResizerAa
NEW YORK DAWN™NEW YORK DAWN™
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • New York
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
  • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Art
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Follow US
NEW YORK DAWN™ > Blog > Trending > What a Reckoning at the Supreme Court Could Look Like
What a Reckoning at the Supreme Court Could Look Like
Trending

What a Reckoning at the Supreme Court Could Look Like

Last updated: July 11, 2022 5:18 pm
Editorial Board Published July 11, 2022
Share
SHARE
10klein 1 facebookJumbo

In my view, court packing, the idea that arguably launched the commission, fails that test. That’s not because adding justices would be a radical break from past practice. Adding and removing justices was common practice in the 1800s, partly as a way to manage the court’s workload and partly as a way to control the court.

In 1801, the Federalists cut the court from six justices to five, in part to deny Thomas Jefferson, who’d won the presidency but hadn’t yet taken office, an appointment. In 1802, Jefferson’s Democratic Republicans restored the sixth seat and, in 1807, added another. In 1837, the court was boosted to nine justices. In 1863, Abraham Lincoln’s Republicans added a 10th seat, and in 1866, after Lincoln’s assassination, they cut it back down to seven seats, to block Andrew Johnson from making appointments. The court was restored to nine seats in 1869, when Ulysses S. Grant, a Republican, took the presidency. That’s where it’s sat ever since.

F.D.R.’s court packing effort in 1937, from this perspective, wasn’t nearly the breach it’s been made out to be, and nor was it an outright failure. The campaign succeeded in cowing the court into embracing much of the New Deal, but it bruised F.D.R. politically, splitting his own party. Altering the court by adding justices has since fallen into disrepute, though it’s still done at the state level, where Republicans added seats to the Arizona and Georgia state Supreme Courts in recent years.

But you can’t fix the court by adding justices. You’re shifting the balance of power by contributing to the underlying problem: turning the court into an untrustworthy institution and setting off a cycle of reprisals with unknown consequences. If Democrats manage to pass a bill adding new justices, Republicans would match or exceed it as soon as they were restored to power, and on and on. For a solution to hold, it needs to be defensible beyond this moment in American politics. Many other ideas pass that test.

Let’s start with the easy one: term limits. Lifetime appointment did not mean, for most of American history, what it means today. The commission notes that until the 1960s, the average length of service on the court was 15 years. Now it’s 26 years — and perhaps rising. As the partisan stakes of Supreme Court nominations have sharpened, life span has become one more variable to game: Parties are looking for the youngest justices they can credibly pick in order to ensure their nominees hold power far into the future.

Worse, because justices retire strategically, power in the court now builds power in the court later. As the commission notes, Trump “appointed three Justices in his single four-year term; his immediate Democratic predecessors, Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, and Jimmy Carter, made only four appointments total in a combined twenty years in office.” Lifetime appointments were intended to insulate the justices from politics. Instead, they have become a driver of the court’s politicization.

You Might Also Like

“A Family’s Fight to Reclaim Their Legacy”

Streamline, Scale, Succeed: Why Global Enterprises Are Moving to Odoo ERP

Beloved Children’s Book 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒑 𝑴𝒚 𝑴𝒐𝒎𝒔 𝑮𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝑴𝒆 Returns to Best-Seller Status Years After Its Release — and Fans Are Begging for More

Model With a Mission: In Conversation With Maurice Giovanni

AI Architecture Pioneer: How Abdul Muqtadir Mohammed Is Reshaping Cloud, Code, and Supply Chains

TAGGED:Biden, Joseph R JrConstitution (US)Democratic PartyHamilton, AlexanderMcConnell, MitchRepublican PartySupreme Court (US)Term Limits (Political Office)The Washington MailTrump, Donald JUnited States
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow
Popular News
Kristian Winfield: The Knicks didn’t win Recreation 3 vs. Pistons with expertise, they received with coronary heart
Sports

Kristian Winfield: The Knicks didn’t win Recreation 3 vs. Pistons with expertise, they received with coronary heart

Editorial Board April 25, 2025
The week’s bestselling books, June 1
Shouldering the burden: Analysis paints a greater image of accidents that occur to an often-vexing joint
Why our waistlines develop in center age—getting old stem cells shift into overdrive
American Modern Opera Company Takes Over the Ojai Festival

You Might Also Like

Global Security and Health Resilience: How AI-Driven Systems Could Reinvent National Safety—And the Visionary Behind the Shift
Trending

Global Security and Health Resilience: How AI-Driven Systems Could Reinvent National Safety—And the Visionary Behind the Shift

June 16, 2025
How AI Is Being Used to Enforce Modern Kleptocracy
TechnologyTrending

How AI Is Being Used to Enforce Modern Kleptocracy

June 16, 2025
We’ve Cracked the Code to Reality — And It Changes Everything
LifestyleTrending

We’ve Cracked the Code to Reality — And It Changes Everything

June 12, 2025
India Leads the World in Climate Action with Historic Tree Plantation Record
TrendingWorld

India Leads the World in Climate Action with Historic Tree Plantation Record

June 10, 2025

Categories

  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • World
  • Art

About US

New York Dawn is a proud and integral publication of the Enspirers News Group, embodying the values of journalistic integrity and excellence.
Company
  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • Accessibility Statement
Contact Us
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Term of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
© 2024 New York Dawn. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?