By WILL WEISSERT
WASHINGTON (AP) — Prime officers in President Donald Trump’s administration have contradicted a few of his latest feedback about the USA taking long-term management of Gaza. Additionally they have performed down the potential for sending in U.S. troops and completely resettling Palestinians amid rebuilding efforts that American pursuits may lead however U.S. taxpayers wouldn’t essentially pay for.
Trump’s remarks Tuesday night time set off alarm in Arab nations and even amongst a few of his Republican allies. The uproar led Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White Home press secretary Karoline Leavitt to attempt to stroll again the feedback a day later.
Then Trump took to his social media platform Thursday to insist that the U.S. may take over Gaza while not having to ship in troops. He advised that Gaza’s residents can be resettled elsewhere within the Mideast as American pursuits “slowly and carefully begin the construction of what would become one of the greatest and most spectacular developments of its kind on Earth.”
Trump hardly appears to be retreating from his authentic sentiments. The truth is, it seems he’s making an attempt to stroll again a few of his administration’s personal walk-back.
“The Gaza Strip would be turned over to the United States by Israel at the conclusion of fighting” between Israel and Hamas, Trump posted. He added: “No soldiers by the U.S. would be needed!”
Hamas has been designated as a terrorist group by the USA, Canada and the European Union.
Right here’s a have a look at what Trump, Rubio and Leavitt mentioned, and the important thing areas by which they disagree:
On refugee resettlement outdoors of Gaza
Trump on Tuesday: “I hope we can do something where they wouldn’t want to go back.”
“If we can get a beautiful area to resettle people, permanently, in nice homes where they can be happy and not be shot and not be killed and not be knifed to death like what’s happening in Gaza.”
Rubio on Wednesday: “In the interim, obviously, people are going to have to live somewhere while you’re rebuilding it. It is akin to a natural disaster. What he very generously has offered is the ability of the United States to go in and help with debris removal, help with munitions removal, help with reconstruction — the rebuilding of homes and businesses and things of this nature, so that then people can move back in.”
Leavitt on Wednesday: “The president has made it clear that they need to be temporarily relocated out of Gaza.”
Trump on Thursday: “The Palestinians, people like Chuck Schumer, would have already been resettled in far safer and more beautiful communities, with new and modern homes, in the region. They would actually have a chance to be happy, safe, and free.” Schumer is the Senate Democratic chief.
On sending US troops to Gaza
Trump on Tuesday: “We will do what is necessary. If it’s necessary, we’ll do that.”
Rubio on Wednesday: “It was not meant as a hostile move. It was meant as, I think, a very generous move, the offer to rebuild and to be in charge of the rebuilding.”
Leavitt on Wednesday: “The president has not committed to putting boots on the ground in Gaza.”
Trump on Thursday: “The Gaza Strip would be turned over to the United States by Israel at the conclusion of fighting.”
“No soldiers by the U.S. would be needed!”
On the US taking long-term management and overseeing reconstruction of Gaza
Trump on Tuesday: “I do see a long-term ownership position, and I see it bringing great stability to that part of the Middle East, and maybe the entire Middle East.”
“We’re going to take over that piece and we’re going to develop it, create thousands and thousands of jobs. And it will be something that the entire Middle East can be very proud of.”
“We have an opportunity to do something that could be phenomenal. And I don’t want to be cute. I don’t want to be a wise guy. But the Riviera of the Middle East.”
“This could be so magnificent. But more importantly than that is the people that have been absolutely destroyed that live there now can live in peace in a much better situation because they are living in hell. And those people will now be able to live in peace. We’ll make sure that it’s done world class.”
Rubio on Wednesday: “What President Trump announced yesterday is the offer, the willingness, of the United States to become responsible for the reconstruction of that area.”
Leavitt on Wednesday: “It’s been made very clear to the president that the United States needs to be involved in this rebuilding effort to ensure stability in the region for all people. It does not mean American taxpayers will be funding this effort. It means Donald Trump, who is the best dealmaker on the planet, is going to strike a deal with our partners in the region.”
Trump on Thursday: “The U.S., working with great development teams from all over the World, would slowly and carefully begin the construction of what would become one of the greatest and most spectacular developments of its kind on Earth. No soldiers by the U.S. would be needed! Stability for the region would reign!!!”
Initially Revealed: February 6, 2025 at 12:35 PM EST
